[at-l] Soviet Propaganda Flight 800 (WAY OT)

[Point North]

What's just as disgusting is the cover-up story on the plane that was shot down over Pennsylvania on 9/11/01.  The gov't knew it was a hijacked plane and made a decision to shoot the plane down rather than let it go on it's course to Washington.  Yet, they arrogantly covered it up and the cowardly press doesn't challenge it.  

That's what really burns me.  Not so much that they shot it down, which was a rational decision that makes sense, but that the media is too spineless to put the lie in the spotlight.  Tell me the truth and we can argue about whether it is right, but don't lie to me.

RoksnRoots at aol.com wrote: 

      Sorry to post this to the list but they have gone too far. I won't do 
it again but have to post this or lose my self-respect.


             CNN just did a 2 hour program showing how TWA Flight 800 crashed 
because of a center wing tank explosion. TWA 800 crashed because of an Al 
Qaeda suicide aircraft and two military missiles shot in an attempt to shoot down 
the suicide aircraft. I'm disgusted that CNN just did what amounts to a 
Soviet state media propaganda campaign against the US people and constitution. 
Shame. 

           I'll cut to the chase, after going out of their way to discredit 
several soft proponents of the shootdown theory, the baiting CNN interviewer 
asked leading questions backing the official version. Never once did CNN mention 
the ongoing lawsuit by MIT professor Graham Sephton against the FBI, or 
retired 747 captain and PhD in aviation engineering Ray Lhar against the CIA. Nor 
was any mention given of the TWA800.com web site where credible retired pilots 
and other professionals offered scientific evidence proving it was a 
shootdown/suicide aircraft. Jack Cashill's book 'First Strike' gives a pretty good 
account (also never mentioned). 


            Sephton is suing FBI because several bodies from Flight 800 
contained bb pellets recovered by the Long Island coroner. He had them tested and 
they proved to be made of metals that Boeing said it doesn't use in its 
aircraft. Those metals, however, are used in missile warheads. FBI confiscated the 
pellets and recorded their composition in its official records of the crash. 
Sephton was suing under the Freedom Of Information Act to get those documents. 
After winning a ruling for the documents, Sephton was sent only the cover page 
for the material and nothing else. FBI said it couldn't find the rest and was 
sorry but it tried its best. A federal judge in Boston said FBI had acted very 
poorly in this matter but had satisfied an attempt to comply with the Act. He 
found in their favor. This was never mentioned in the CNN piece.

         Ray Lahr has high science showing that a nose-less 747 cannot "fly 
on for another 30 seconds" simply because the aircraft would go into a fatal 
and immediate center of gravity shift, stall, and roll and drop like a rock. The 
feds have been stonewalling Lhar for many years now. Lhar is suing CIA for 
the data by which they determined this zoom climb fly-on. This is simple airline 
crash investigation. There's no reason not to release simple data. CIA 
refuses. Not mentioned by CNN.

        A National Guard pilot who witnessed the shootdown said after the 
missile impacted Flight 800 "dropped like a rock" (as did several other 
witnesses). He was also a Vietnam veteran and considered himself an expert at 
recognizing ordnance explosions. He said the missile explosion was definitely ordnance. 
This was not mentioned on the CNN program that called these experts 
"conspiracy theorists".

          Mike Wire, an ironworker union member was fixing a highway bridge 
20 miles from the explosion. He said Flight 800's explosion created a boom that 
"shook the superstructure of the bridge" he was working on. This is important 
because Mike Wire sought out the investigators to tell them what he 
experienced. He specifically said he saw the missile go up and impact Flight 800 and 
then felt the shockwave. Wire probably didn't realize he was giving critical 
information in simple form in his statement. You see a center tank fuel explosion 
occurs at 300 feet per second. That is, aviation fuel explodes at 300 feet 
per second by physical rule. Such an explosion is too 'soft' to shake a steel 
bridge at 20 miles. Ordnance, however, explodes at 2000 feet per second. A 2000 
foot per second explosion will shake a steel bridge at 20 miles. When Wire got 
a copy of his statement from the investigation record he found it had been 
changed. Nothing about this on CNN.

      A radar tape caught a 2000 foot per second ejecta pattern from Flight 
800. Impossible for a fuel explosion to cause.

         The nose gear wheel well door was found blown inward by a severe 
force. An internal explosion would necessarily blast this outward. 


        A metal frame spar from the tail section was found in the nose 
wreckage. This is physically impossible for a blast occurring in the ship's middle. 
And, also, drastically counters the official version of the nose dropping away 
while the rest of the plane flew on.


         Of the 270, or so, witnesses who saw a missile rise and impact 
Flight 800 a good percentage described a "zig-zag" motion of the red flare before 
it shot straight for the 747. This is the classic description of a missile 
homing in on and acquiring its target. The feds excluded all these witnesses 
saying "witness testimonies are unreliable". Yet nowhere did CIA attempt to explain 
how a trail of burning fuel zig-zags. 

      And, oh yeah, if you saw the program the reason the "bogey" caught on 
the radar tape took 30 seconds to cross one sweep is because it was the suicide 
aircraft and not a missile. 

          The constitution was a good idea. 


         www.TWA800.com







*



          
_______________________________________________
AT-L Mailing List.  

Go here to unsubscribe or change your options:

http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com