[at-l] replying

Cutter cutter78 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 22 16:43:05 CST 2007


You shouldn't get it twice if the original poster's address is still there.
The mail server takes care of that.

Of course, I could be wrong. It's happened before.

-- 
Cutter
http://cutter.wordpress.com


On 1/22/07, Felix J <athiker at smithville.net> wrote:
>
>
> I do it by 'reply all' then, deleting the original sender's address...so
> as they don't get it twice. (I HATE gettin' it twice)
>



More information about the at-l mailing list