[at-l] Shoes, was: Re: Consensus?
TrailR at aol.com
TrailR at aol.com
Sun Oct 5 00:12:30 CDT 2008
In a message dated 10/3/2008 11:28:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rockdancer97 at comcast.net writes:
The model was Hardrock, they were discounted shoes, bought for $59 I think,
because they were last year's model (2007). I don't think there was anything
magic about these particular shoes except like most trailrunners they have a
stiff mid-sole. I'm 150 lbs, carry 30 lb pack so I'm not particularly hard on
them. They look pretty worn and I was told they would last 300-500 miles.
After that trip I'm using them on local trails but would buy another pair if I
was heading out for any long distance hike.
--RockDancer
The Montrail Hardrocks were a great shoe in 2007, but beware of the 2008
model. Not as good. It was made by a new company (colombia?), who doesn't know
shoes (but I hear 09 may be better, another company (mountain Hardware? ) is
doing them.
Hotdog
**************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.
Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!
(http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://patsy.hack.net/pipermail/at-l/attachments/20081005/0648941e/attachment.html
More information about the at-l
mailing list