[at-l] Challenge to "Paintball"

[David Addleton]

now thats a fine, fine distinction clyde makes there and it evidences
his ACLU tendencies like no other comment he's made and written only
as a true warior could write it . . . or . . . as my idjiot client
would put it:  "I have a constitutional right to be a drunk!"

On 11/23/09, rcli4 at comcast.net <rcli4 at comcast.net> wrote:
> I was not defending Minnesota Smith.  I was defending his right to hike his
> own hike without being condemed and laughed at for it.  I'm funny thay way.
> I believe you have the right to be an idiot, uninfringed.  I think that mean
> people suck.
>
> Clyde
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Frank Looper
>
> To: Jan Lite
>
> Cc: rcli4 at comcast.net, at-l
>
> Sent: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:27:07 +0000 (UTC)
>
> Subject: Re: [at-l] Challenge to "Paintball"
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Jan Lite wrote:
>
>> Molesting a Rottweiler is pretty impressive.
>
>> ;-)
>
>>
>
> Just last week, T. Clide was defending Minnesota Smith big time. I'll
>
> bet he didn't know how Smittie feels about dogs. That senile idjit
>
> told me that if my dog got near enough to him on the trail, he'd
>
> assume it was vicious and do his best to kill it.
>
>
>
> There are some here who have met my dog. Can you imagine anyone being
>
> scared of Tinkerbell? She's the world's best trail dog, now that Annie
>
> is gone.
>
>
>
> You know, there are some things that a man would willingly return to
>
> prison for. I can't think of many, but hurting my wife or my dog in
>
> front of me, for no reason whatsoever, would rank high amongst those
>
> reasons. But that's just me.
>
>
>
> Dr. DoVeryLittle
>
>
>