[at-l] 2nd Amndmnt Re: Coyote Attack
Carla & Dave Hicks
carla_dave_hicks at verizon.net
Thu Oct 29 22:16:57 CDT 2009
Not sure what is on-topic or off-topic for this list, as it is Ryan's and I
respect his rules for his list.
However, it's not much of a change as for as the law & the AT is concerned --
as it has been legal to carry on much of the AT for years -- USFS lands, most
of PA, much of NC/TN, VA, GA, VT, NH, etc
Check out: http://www.handgunlaw.us/
Chainsaw
----- Original Message -----
From: "JPL" <jplynch at crosslink.net>
To: "Ryan Brooks" <ryan at hack.net>
Cc: "at-l" <at-l at backcountry.net>; <jim.stewart at usa.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] 2nd Amndmnt Re: Coyote Attack
Not so. Important new question for hiking the AT in the national parks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ryan Brooks
To: JPL
Cc: Tom McGinnis ; David Addleton ; jim.stewart at usa.net ; at-l
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [at-l] 2nd Amndmnt Re: Coyote Attack
Drifting off-topic here.
JPL wrote:
> That's all well and good, but how should I behave around a
> gun-carrier? One who is no doubt afraid of me? (else why else would
> he have a gun). This is not a trivial question. I guess the best
> thing is to back away slowly and keep your hands in plain sight. Talk
> slowly and softly or not at all. Sounds like fun.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Tom McGinnis <mailto:sloetoe at yahoo.com>
> *To:* David Addleton <mailto:dfaddleton at gmail.com> ;
> jim.stewart at usa.net <mailto:jim.stewart at usa.net> ; JPL
> <mailto:jplynch at crosslink.net>
> *Cc:* at-l <mailto:at-l at backcountry.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:36 PM
> *Subject:* 2nd Amndmnt Re: [at-l] Coyote Attack
>
> --- On Thu, 10/29/09, JPL <jplynch at crosslink.net
> <mailto:jplynch at crosslink.net>> wrote:
>
> > Not to mention that now we've got a new law that says
> > anyone can carry guns in national parks. How crazy is
> > that? Anyone have any idea of how to act around someone who is
> carrying
> > a gun to protect themselves against maybe you? Scary.
>
> ### What's crazy is that we should *need* a law to "allow" us to
> carry out a natural law (self preservation) in the first place.
> Like the saying goes, "What part of 'Shall not be infringed' don't
> you understand?" Yeah, I want a bureaucrat deciding when it's okay
> and not for me to protect myself.
>
> Just thought I'd throw that out there....
>
> colormeliberaltoe
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
at-l mailing list
at-l at backcountry.net
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
More information about the at-l
mailing list