[at-l] 2nd Amendment, etc.

[camojack at comcast.net]

I'm no lawyer (nor do I play one on television) but since a lease is a voluntary agreement, those tenants could presumably live elsewhere if they would prefer not having to abide by that landlord's rules. 



Or they could just shoot him, and be done with it... ;-) 



-"Camo" 



PS: To make it hiking related, I've never carried any of my guns whilst hiking; I carry enough stuff already. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leslie Booher" <lbooher at charter.net> 
To: "Tom McGinnis" <sloetoe at yahoo.com>, "David Addleton" <dfaddleton at gmail.com>, "jim stewart" <jim.stewart at usa.net>, "JPL" <jplynch at crosslink.net> 
Cc: "at-l" <at-l at backcountry.net> 
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:51:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [at-l] 2nd Amndmnt  Re:  Coyote Attack 

On tonight's news, there was a piece about an apartment landlord who has a clause in his lease agreements that the tenants can't have guns on the premises. I wonder if this one will go to the Supreme Court in some form. Two different parts of the Constitution are in conflict here. Does the right to bear arms trump the owner's property rights? Just a rhetorical question for thought. Don't answer! The list is too full now. a'bear Humankind (be both) 
_______________________________________________ at-l mailing list at-l at backcountry.net http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://patsy.hack.net/pipermail/at-l/attachments/20091030/b385feaa/attachment.html