[at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

nightwalker.at at gmail.com nightwalker.at at gmail.com
Sat Jan 23 13:22:49 CST 2010


I thought Jim O was/is older than that. Maybe he just looks older.

You know, like how Clyde is older than Shoe, but twice as beat-up looking? He blames it on a a life spent outdoors. I blame it on the genes. She just looks lots better in 'em.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Bullard <jim.bullard at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:17 PM
To: nightwalker.at at gmail.com <nightwalker.at at gmail.com>
Cc: giniajim <jplynch at crosslink.net>; at-l <at-l at backcountry.net>
Subject: Re: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

Age? Ha! I'm 65. Beat that you scurrilous rascals.
New, old or original? I suspect we're all originals.
I hope I'm not scary.

Jim Bullard
http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/
http://members.photoportfolios.net/Jim_Bullard
http://www.photoshelter.com/c/jim_bullard


On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:02 PM, nightwalker.at at gmail.com <nightwalker.at at gmail.com> wrote:
If there's a a better method of telling you scurrilous rascals apart, I'm all for for it.

 How about old, older and oldest?
 New, old and original?
 Nice, ambivalent and scary?
 Numbering just worked for me.

 -----Original Message-----
 From: giniajim <jplynch at crosslink.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 1:53 PM
 To: Jim Bullard <jim.bullard at gmail.com>; <nightwalker.at at gmail.com>
 Cc: at-l <at-l at backcountry.net>
 Subject: Re: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

Am I Jim #3 ?  Do I get a prize?  Bronze medal or something? 
----- Original Message -----
 From: Jim Bullard
 To: nightwalker.at at gmail.com
 Cc: at-l
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 1:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

 Time to call Roto-Rooter.

 Jim Bullard
http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/
http://members.photoportfolios.net/Jim_Bullard
http://www.photoshelter.com/c/jim_bullard


 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:11 PM, nightwalker.at at gmail.com <nightwalker.at at gmail.com> wrote:
 I was talking about the longer one that Jim #3 quoted earlier. It showed up 10 minutes later.

 That's been happening lately. I think that my Intertubes are clogged...
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Jim Bullard <jim.bullard at gmail.com>
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 1:03 PM
 To: nightwalker.at at gmail.com <nightwalker.at at gmail.com>
 Cc: at-l <at-l at backcountry.net>
 Subject: Re: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

 ??? The original reply? It was a one liner that just said I'd done both 20 miles days and snowshoeing but never both together.

 Jim Bullard
http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/
http://members.photoportfolios.net/Jim_Bullard
http://www.photoshelter.com/c/jim_bullard


 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:57 PM, nightwalker.at at gmail.com <nightwalker.at at gmail.com> wrote:
 I TOTALLY missed the email from NY Jim.  wonder if that happens a lot?. Been having trouble with the smart phone. May be time to reset and re-install the accessories. No biggie.
 -----Original Message-----
  From: giniajim <jplynch at crosslink.net>
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:03 PM
  To: Jim Bullard <jim.bullard at gmail.com>; at-l <at-l at backcountry.net>
  Subject: Re: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

 The comparisons aren't apples-to-apples.  The comparison needs to be hiking/walking vs. snowshoeing, or backpacking vs. snowshoeing with a backpack.  And equivalent terrain, pack weights, etc.
   
 ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jim Bullard
 To: at-l
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:28 AM
  Subject: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng

  Frank asked if anyone had snowshoed 20 miles in a day. I responded the I had hiked 20 miles per day and I had snowshoed but never the two together then I got wondering what the difference in exertion would be. Having done both activities I know that snowshoeing is more strenuous. There is a site I frequent <http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/calories.htm> for such calculations and I went there to check it out. I put in 200# and 60 minutes as the parameters then figured 2mph to complete the 20 miles totally 10 hours. The result was 6670 calories burning backpacking vs 7620 calories for snowshoeing or 14.24% more energy required for snowshoeing. So if you try it... take extra food.

  P.S. I'm not clear how they calculate the energy burned (something to do with oxygen consumption I think) but I notice the, some though not all, of the activities are tagged "Taylor Code". I've tried without success to find out what that refers to. Anyone know?

  Jim Bullard
http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/
http://members.photoportfolios.net/Jim_Bullard
http://www.photoshelter.com/c/jim_bullard

 _______________________________________________
  at-l mailing list
at-l at backcountry.net
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l


 _______________________________________________
 at-l mailing list
at-l at backcountry.net
http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l




More information about the at-l mailing list