[at-l] OT - Freedom of Speech was Snowshoeing VS Hiking

Tim Rich athiker89 at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 24 19:31:04 CST 2010


Return of land seized by eminent domain sounds more like siding with the individual than those nasty corporations.  

--- On Sun, 1/24/10, rcli4 at comcast.net <rcli4 at comcast.net> wrote:

> From: rcli4 at comcast.net <rcli4 at comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [at-l] OT - Freedom of Speech was Snowshoeing VS Hiking
> To: "nightwalker at" <nightwalker.at at gmail.com>
> Cc: at-l at mailman.backcountry.net, bror8588 at aol.com
> Date: Sunday, January 24, 2010, 6:58 PM
> #yiv2038596376
> {height:100%;color:#000000;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial;}Evil
> Corporations is really funny.  I'm guessing that 65
> percent of folks work for corporations.  Corporations
> are pieces of paper.  I owned a corp for 24 and a half
> years. I contributed to candidates and the republican party
> every one of those years.  I also donated more to the
> boys and girls club then most of the folks reading this made
> in those 24 years.  Frank, if your gonna talk shit, try
> to do it with a narrower brush.
> 
> Clyde
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nightwalker at 
> To: Jim Bullard , bror8588 at aol.com
> Cc: at-l at mailman.backcountry.net
> Sent: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [at-l] OT - Freedom of Speech was Snowshoeing
> VS Hiking
> 
> Jim, before they're through, the Roberts court will do
> more harm to the country than has been thought of yet. And
> that's not politics. I'm talking about things like
> removing protected status for lots of places we hold near
> and dear.
> 
> 
> 
> I could see a lawsuit being brought that gets to the USSOC
> that totally takes the teeth out of the National Scenic
> Trails Act. Up to and including the forced return of lands
> siezed by eminent domain acquisitions. All it will take is
> the right plaintiff with enough money, coming up through the
> correct Federal court district. It could happen. I really
> hope not, though.
> 
> 
> 
> As I said, this isn't about politics. And for future
> reference to whoever may not know the difference: I AM NOT A
> LIBERAL!!! I just believe that people should be put before
> corporations. Oh well.
> 
> 
> 
> Hug a tree for Thomas Jefferson.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Jim Bullard 
> 
> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:54 PM
> 
> To: 
> 
> Cc: ; 
> 
> Subject: Re: [at-l] OT - Freedom of Speech was Snowshoeing
> VS Hiking
> 
> 
> 
> IMO The Bill of Rights was intended to protect the freedoms
> of individuals. Corporations are not individuals and money
> is not speech. Yeah, I know they are virtual persons for
> liability purposes but that shouldn't extend to
> everything else. The next thing you know they'll be
> granting them the vote. Same goes for unions as far as
> I'm concerned.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:28 PM, wrote:
> 
> Are you referring to the Unions?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: nightwalker.at at gmail.com 
> 
> To: giniajim ; Felix J 
> 
> Cc: at-l 
> 
> Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 2:11 pm
> 
> Subject: Re: [at-l] Snowshoeing VS Hikng
> 
> 
> 
> You mean the same guys that, only last week, gave
> corporations the right to buy 
> 
> all future elections? Those guys? Right...
> 
> 
> 
> Jim Bullard
> 
> http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/
> 
> http://members.photoportfolios.net/Jim_Bullard
> 
> http://www.photoshelter.com/c/jim_bullard
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> at-l mailing list
> 
> at-l at backcountry.net
> 
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
> 


      



More information about the at-l mailing list