[at-l] Our wild national parks
bror8588 at aol.com
bror8588 at aol.com
Mon Aug 22 10:34:16 CDT 2011
Keeping dangerous animals in one's home or on one's property should not imply that the government is responsible for allowing nature to survive in wilderness parks. It behooves the hiker or visitor to a National Park or even private property where wild animals live, to use caution when entering such wilderness. The animals we encounter in the wild are usually reticent to meet humans but if they do (as Bears, Goats, Sheep, etc.) then it is the encroacher's (us) responsibility to use caution and common sense.
Certainly the government is not responsible for the actions of wildlife in their inclination to survive. Of course, if one is a lawyer then logic becomes absent.
From: David Addleton <dfaddleton at gmail.com>
To: Nina Rogers <infpeace at gmail.com>
Cc: at-l at mailman.backcountry.net
Sent: Mon, Aug 22, 2011 2:21 pm
Subject: Re: [at-l] Our wild national parks
So, if you keep pit bulls and they've attacked prior guests who visited you at your farm over the last two years, and they attacked and bit vice president Biden when he visited you, it's
(a) your fault for not keeping your animals under control?
(b) your dog's fault because animals will be animals?
(c) the lawyer's fault for reminding you, and the judge, and jury, and the media about the prior attacks?
(d) the government's fault for permitting laws to exist that make your responsible for the animals you keep?
(e) our fault because ours is a government by and for the people?
Does your answer change when you replace "pit bulls" with any animal you choose?
Does your answer change when you replace "vice president Biden" with any politician, movie star, friend, family member, or other person whom you choose?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Nina Rogers <infpeace at gmail.com> wrote:
Here's a recent op-ed piece from the NYT on our untamed wilderness. The general theme: "No matter how many lawyers tread the landscape, it’s impossible to safety-proof a national park." http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/20/nature-without-the-nanny-state/
My apologies if this has already been posted. I'm about a week behind on e-mail.
at-l mailing list
at-l at backcountry.net
With best regards,
David F. Addleton
Attorney at Law
practicing consumer law as
ADDLETON LTD. CO.
355 Cotton Avenue
Macon Georgia 31201
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, transmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and delete the copy you received. Thank you.
t-l mailing list
t-l at backcountry.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the at-l