[at-l] Earl Shaffer's hike questioned

Jim Bullard jim.bullard at gmail.com
Sun Jul 3 12:27:22 CDT 2011

And WF's later admission that some of his own "thrus" were somewhat less
than thrus. If all you're getting out of your hikes are stats IMO you wasted
the time it took to do them.

Jim Bullard

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Mark Hudson <mvhudson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Amazing what people can waste there time on... I assume the author is going
> to investigate Gene Espy next, especially since he's still alive? <insert
> irony here>.
> Reminds me of the story of some years ago of Wingfoot interviewing Earl,
> and "approving" of his hike. Was I the only one that thought it should be
> the other way around?
> skeeter
> _______________________________________________
> at-l mailing list
> at-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://patsy.hack.net/pipermail/at-l/attachments/20110703/5316b78a/attachment.html 

More information about the at-l mailing list