[Cdt-l] No Trespassing signs on the Columbus Route?

[Sly]

I'm not quite sure where you're talking about but we passed through a 
gate on a dirt county road.  It was a large hunting reserve.  We walked 
softly on the county rd and got approached by the guy in a pick up truck 
that was father of the owner of the property.  He recognized us as 
hikers and offered water when we reached his house.  I went in, got the 
water and had some juice as we talked a little about the trail.  I'm not 
even sure if the same ranch is there, but their main concern at the time 
was from hunters and poachers.

We passed through on another gated road with some added stealth bush 
whacking and never met anyone.   It's fun, give it a shot, just try not 
to get shot at.  ; )

Sly

On 2/11/2011 3:04 PM, nathanael lintner wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I am planning a NB thru-hike of the CDT for 2011. I am studying the 
> 2010 Ley maps and I noticed that in two places on map Columbus04 there 
> are notes (notes 2 and 6) saying that there are "Locked gates and No 
> Trespassing signs." I was wondering, are these legitimate "No 
> Tresspassing" signs? One of them (note 6) looks like it in the 
> National Forest. Has anyone hiked that way? Are the signs still there? 
> What did you do?
>
>
> Nathanael Lintner
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cdt-l mailing list
> Cdt-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/cdt-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/cdt-l/attachments/20110211/1394c03e/attachment.html