[Cdt-l] All Jerry's Waypooints/POI's on postholer google maps

[Andrew James]

Scott and Jerry, thank you very much!  The postholer web site is really
cool.  I've been looking at Montana with the Mapbook and the website and
I'm totally sold on the Mapbook now.  Never really realized how lousy the
current maps of the trail are until I saw this.  You can zoom in on the
waypoints and actually see the trail, but the blue line is hundreds and
even thousands of feet away.  The waypoints really look spot on.  I am
beginning to consider following the official route exactly now. For one
thing I would rather hike trails than roads, plus the precision of the maps
is awesome.  The detail of the switchbacks on Map 8 just blows me away.

I will be starting Wyoming in mid June from Hogg Park if I can get a ride
in there.  Really getting excited to get out and hike!


Andrew (longhiker)

On Wednesday, March 7, 2012,  <bcss at bresnan.net> wrote:
> Lots of differences. I just have looked at the Wyoming route so far.  Many
> of the differences I see are road walks that have been re-located to more
> primitive routes by BLM and USFS, and that is a good thing.
>
> Some examples - 02_135 to 02_223 has been moved from dirt tracks to the
> spine and is a really nice, scenic walk. Another glaring example is 05_000
> to 05_131.  This gets the route off of a busy paved road and onto a combo
of
> trail and small jeep trails.  Also a nice hike, but a bit longer than
> following the blacktop.  We moved the alignment passing through Rawlins to
> utilize a pedestrian underpass.  The blue line crosses the railroad tracks
> on a bridge that is closed to foot traffic.  (BTW, we checked with the
> Rawlins police department and they said they would issue citations to
> anybody that crosses that bridge on foot.) Likewise, north of Rawlins the
> route has been moved off of busy highways onto a combination of trail and
> two-tracks.  It's nicer and substantially shorter than the depicted blue
> line.
>
> In some other places the blue line would be an improvement over the
official
> route. Good example of that is the route from 12_069 to Big Sandy.
 Official
> route is lower and shorter, but the blue line is unquestionably more
scenic.
>
>
> Anyway, this is a great resource for people to use to surf the trail from
> home and look at the big picture. Especially in the satellite view.
>
> I would like to point out that the Waypoint files provided free on my
> website are intended to be used with either the Mapbook or USGS
topographic
> maps.  They were not intended to be a single resource for hiking the
trail.
> Any information not included in the waypoint files (like some creek names,
> if they are named at all) are clearly shown on the maps.
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Jerry Brown
> mailto:bcss at bresnan.net
> www.bearcreeksurvey.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-l-bounces at backcountry.net [mailto:cdt-l-bounces at backcountry.net]
> On Behalf Of Scott
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:06 PM
> To: cdt-l at backcountry.net
> Subject: [Cdt-l] All Jerry's Waypooints/POI's on postholer google maps
>
> All of Jerry's waypoints/POIs have been added to the CDT google map, in
> addition to the 600+ our hikers already have, that's 7746 points.
>
> Here's the link, BUT BEWARE, it may kill your browser (keep clicking
> continue for it to load properly, yes I need a marker manager):
> http://postholer.com/gmap/gmap.php?trail_id=2&markertype=14
>
> What is really interesting is to see how different the trail is compared
to
> what folks have been hiking.
>
> When Jerry was saying the trail was 3,008 miles I was highly skeptical
about
> that. Seeing the 'big picture' you can see that the trail is that long.
>
> -postholer
>
>
> --
> www.postholer.com
> _______________________________________________
> Cdt-l mailing list
> Cdt-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/cdt-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cdt-l mailing list
> Cdt-l at backcountry.net
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/cdt-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/cdt-l/attachments/20120307/a5b7b8e7/attachment.html