jonathan at phlumf.com
Tue Jan 28 15:59:27 CST 2014
Thanks for the info Dan (and secretly, I was hoping someone would reply just this way)... I knew there were other, more affordable options - and I think there are others aside from Qgis... (arcGIS is way overkill - 95% of what it does isn't needed for basic map creation like this). Every time I've looked into it, I just don't have time to delve deep enough. I'd be really curious to hear what you learn. I'm an engineer too, but only semi-geek, so I guess you can see why I'm hesitant to tackle this... it's enough just updating what I have already.
Anyway, I suppose we're getting a bit off the subject of the CDT specifically, for CDT-L discussions. I'd love to see what you come up with though!
btw, I hope my last message didn't come off as too critical of the USGS. I think their default US Topo maps are headed in the right direction... just seems that they stopped updating the old quads before the new digital replacements were really ready for the masses.
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 28, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Dan Bedore <mr_dan_bedore at yahoo.com> wrote:
> It was just mentioned that ArcGIS cost a thousand dollars.
> Qgis is free. I have been teaching myself to use it recently. I am an engineer and a super geek, and still I find a huge learning curve. So it's not a simple solution. But it is a very powerful program for making maps. And free data is available for maps of many things of interest to hikers.
> For example, I'm trying to plot the major western us trails on maps of annual precipitation, elevation, land ownership, and many other things. All of this data is available free.
> The difficulty of using this program is huge. But I think the benefits will be too. Some of you may want to try this.
> When I get some of my maps done, I'll share them on this list.
> Dan Bedore
> Cdt-l mailing list
> Cdt-l at backcountry.net
More information about the Cdt-l