[pct-l] Pct-l Digest, Vol 4, Issue 18

[AsABat]

No, it makes more sense when you realize Greg misspelled intimately.
 
-----Original Message-----
 
Thank you Chris.  I thought it was me..............

This this a post from Jack Daniels????

Huh?!?!

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 4:28 pm, bighummel at aol.com wrote:
> It is pondering on legal issues that considering the status of 
> copywrited material is conceivably, unconscientiously, unbelievably 
> silly to take serious unless mutual parties of substantial interest
are 
> intimitly involved in several dimensions of the standard postings.  
> That said, a court, in your state or mine might find that unconscious 
> bodies are literally falling forward to understand the stupidity of 
> such a consideration.
>
> In my limited and twisted legal opinion,
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.backcountry.net/pipermail/pct-l/attachments/20080106/a79355e6/attachment.html