[pct-l] Sasquatch footprints explained - Was How fast do feet change

[Craig Stanton]

This foot print was found in 1977 right? Well even if foot growth was  
cumulative year-on-year I don't think there would have been time to  
grow that big even if it was from Ryback or Watson.


On 27/01/2008, at 4:33 PM, Len Glassner wrote:

> There's no Bigfoot - That print in your video is simply the remnant of
> a thru-hiker, albeit one who appears to have abandoned shoes
> altogether.
>
> On 1/26/08, Scott Herriott <yetifan at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Monty wrote:
>>
>>
>> Bigger shoes is right.................. but even
>> bigger.
>
>
>> I completely agree.
> _______________________________________________
> Pct-l mailing list
> Pct-l at backcountry.net
> To unsubscribe or change list options (digest, etc):
> http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/pct-l