[pct-l] PCT Mom: Re: "Oregon don't look good"

OMullis omullis at aircanopy.net
Sun Jun 1 22:12:41 CDT 2008


After poking around a bit more, I found the tabular data and see that 
they're less dramatic
than the averages imply.  Even those SNOTELs that show still 50+ inches I'd 
expect to be
essentially clear of snow by Sept, or significantly reduced at least.

Thanks to all for helping a new hiker come up the learning curve, and thanks 
for constructing
the Postholer site... lots of good info.

Ollen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Postholer" <public at postholer.com>
To: <pct-l at backcountry.net>
Cc: <zaqueltooocool at gmail.com>; <omullis at aircanopy.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 10:06 PM
Subject: [pct-l] PCT Mom: Re: "Oregon don't look good"


> Yeah, it can be a bit misleading near the beginning and end of the snow 
> season when comparing to todays date, especially this year! Graphically, 
> you get a better feel for it if you use the default Apr 1st near the 
> beginning or end of the snow season.
>
> For instance, if you look at the graph for Clear Lake, usually they have 
> no snow on June 1st. But you still have over a foot there today. So the 
> average is several thousand times that of normal. Misleading.
>
> Compare it against the default April 1st and it shows 45% average, which 
> is easier to digest, but still appears to be an enormous amount because of 
> that whole average thing. Misleading.
>
> Only when you look at the tabular data you see about 14.5 inches of snow 
> on the ground. No big deal from the thru hikers perspective. It will 
> probably be gone in a couple weeks.
>
> So while the graph may be misleading at times, you have links to all the 
> official data to give you a reasonable ballpark idea of what's
> going on.
>
> Now that everyone is confused.....  :)
>
> -postholer
>
>>>>>
> Here is the Post Holer link I was looking at. Maybe I'm reading it wrong.
> http://postholer.com/cgi-bin/postHoler?histMonth=6&histDay=1&histYear=2008&avgMonth=6&avgDay=1
>
>> PCT MOM
>
>
>>On 6/1/08, OMullis <omullis at aircanopy.net> wrote:
>>
>> As an Oregon section hiker this coming Sept, I was wondering if you can
>> expand on your comment
>> on the "Post Holer snow depth graph" being "a mess"?   This will be my
>> first foray along
>> the PCT so I'm very curious to know more about what looks out of whack.
>>
>> Thanks for any help you can provide!
>>
>> Ollen Mullis
>> Venus TX
>> PCT-OR Sept2008
>> ____________________________________
> ------------------------------------
> Trails : http://Postholer.Com
> Journals : http://Postholer.Com/journal
> Mobile : http://Postholer.Com/mobi
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1476 - Release 
> Date: 5/31/2008 12:25 PM
>
> 




More information about the Pct-L mailing list