<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Reading all the traffic regarding Ursacks and
Garcias and BearVaults and Bearikades, primarily if not exclusively in the
context of California PCT sections and, being the owner of a never-yet-used
Ursack V27, intended for use in Oregon only Sept 2008... </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I am wondering about the effectiveness and/or
(f)utility of perhaps 'double-bagging'... that is, an Ursack within an
Ursack... </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Rather than eating the cost of my V27 to replace it
with a (perhaps unneeded for Oregon and certainly heavier) BV / Garcia
/Bearikade, might it not be sufficient and overall less costly for me to buy
another V27 and double-bag? I'd be out only $50 more, the twin V27s weigh
in at 16 ounces combined, and, when used in conjunction with odor-proofing
liners might just be a workable and sufficient food protection strategy for
Oregon...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Your opinions will be appreciated and
considered.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ollen</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Venus, TX</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>