<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=3>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 2/29/2008 5:38:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
gkesselr@whidbey.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Nope,
never set foot on it, and probably won't. My responses have been
responses to what others have said about the AT. IF what they've said is
true, then I hope the PCT never becomes like
that. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>--------------------------------------------</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Yeah, we'll leave that for another time. However, I'll leave a few
thoughts. I like the PCT better in atleast one huge respect, and that's
the over all scenic quality. What's better on the AT?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>More water</DIV>
<DIV>More wildlife</DIV>
<DIV>More species</DIV>
<DIV>Longer window</DIV>
<DIV>Less switchbacks</DIV>
<DIV>No stock</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR><DIV><FONT style="color: black; font: normal 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF;"><HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. <A title="http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598" href="http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598" target="_blank">Watch the video on AOL Living.</A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>