[at-l] WB

[Jim Bullard]

Well, my comment wasn't about the ambiance of the site and frankly I
haven't spent enough time on WB to know the ambiance. Occasionally the
chit-chat on AT-L bugs me but it is easy to delete whereas I have to
search for what I want on WB and that, to me, is the real difference.

On 3/2/07, Sloetoe <sloetoe at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ###
> Whiteblaze is serious; at-l is friendly; depends on
> what you want. You can make friends on serious
> Whiteblaze, and you can get info on sociable at-l, and
> in either place, it helps to walk your talk.
>
> (That having been said, I haven't visited Whiteblaze
> at least a year, nor have I been backpacking, nor hit
> a SoRuckPaRuckTrailDazeGathering even. Wuz *that*
> say?)
> Talkin'notwalkin'toe
>
> So what's the hiker version of "all hat and no
> cattle"? All pack and no rattle?
> All boot and no dirt?
> All toque and no ______?
> All gorp and no grit?
> All talk and no miles?   (That'd be me, it seems...)
>
> I need to go for a walk....
>
> --- Jim Bullard <jim.bullard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Me too. I joined WhiteBlaze but hardly ever look at
> > it. I'm also on an
> > Adirondack BB style list. I rarely look at that
> > either. I like having
> > the posts sent to my email. If I don't want to read
> > something it's
> > easy to delete but hunting through a BB to find what
> > I do want to read
> > is a PITA.
> >
>
> Spatior! Nitor! Nitor! Tempero!
>    Pro Pondera Et Meliora.
>


-- 
Jim Bullard
http://jims-ramblings.blogspot.com/