[at-l] 2nd Amendment, etc.

[Frank Looper]

I think C. Jack had the common-sense answer. Therefore, the fional
decision will liokely be somethiong else!

On 10/30/09, camojack at comcast.net <camojack at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> I'm no lawyer (nor do I play one on television) but since a lease is a
> voluntary agreement, those tenants could presumably live elsewhere if they
> would prefer not having to abide by that landlord's rules.
>
>
>
> Or they could just shoot him, and be done with it... ;-)
>
>
>
> -"Camo"
>
>
>
> PS: To make it hiking related, I've never carried any of my guns whilst
> hiking; I carry enough stuff already.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leslie Booher" <lbooher at charter.net>
> To: "Tom McGinnis" <sloetoe at yahoo.com>, "David Addleton"
> <dfaddleton at gmail.com>, "jim stewart" <jim.stewart at usa.net>, "JPL"
> <jplynch at crosslink.net>
> Cc: "at-l" <at-l at backcountry.net>
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:51:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [at-l] 2nd Amndmnt  Re:  Coyote Attack
>
> On tonight's news, there was a piece about an apartment landlord who has a
> clause in his lease agreements that the tenants can't have guns on the
> premises. I wonder if this one will go to the Supreme Court in some form.
> Two different parts of the Constitution are in conflict here. Does the right
> to bear arms trump the owner's property rights? Just a rhetorical question
> for thought. Don't answer! The list is too full now. a'bear Humankind (be
> both)
> _______________________________________________ at-l mailing list
> at-l at backcountry.net http://mailman.backcountry.net/mailman/listinfo/at-l